krish2005
07-09 03:04 PM
Not sure if this is a duplicate post of somebody earlier.
USCIS revised instructions for 131 and when you are on EAD and applying for advance parole
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/i131_biometrics_070808.pdf
USCIS revised instructions for 131 and when you are on EAD and applying for advance parole
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/i131_biometrics_070808.pdf
wallpaper new hairstyles in wow. new
Blog Feeds
05-17 12:40 PM
The NY Times' Nina Bernstein reports on spouses of US citizens who are facing exile for technical and minor violations of their visa status. DHScomes off fairly sympathetically in the story - the implication is they were trying to help and the mean courts and the dysfunctional Congress are to blame. But ICE has a lot of discretion in deciding who to put in to deportation proceedings. They have been encouraged to look at the facts of every case and use common sense in determining which people to put in deportation proceedings. They are not obligated to put every person...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/05/from-the-department-of-do-you-feel-safer.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/05/from-the-department-of-do-you-feel-safer.html)
Macaca
09-27 11:40 AM
Following Bush Over a Cliff (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/26/AR2007092602067.html) By David S. Broder (davidbroder@washpost.com) | Washington Post, September 27, 2007
The spectacle Tuesday of 151 House Republicans voting in lock step with the White House against expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was one of the more remarkable sights of the year. Rarely do you see so many politicians putting their careers in jeopardy.
The bill they opposed, at the urging of President Bush, commands healthy majorities in both the House and Senate but is headed for a veto because Bush objects to expanding this form of safety net for the children of the working poor. He has staked out that ground on his own, ignoring or rejecting the pleas of conservative senators such as Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch, who helped shape the compromise that the House approved and that the Senate endorsed.
SCHIP has been one of the most successful health-care measures created in the past decade. It was started in 1997 with support from both parties, in order to insure children in families with incomes too high to receive Medicaid but who could not afford private insurance.
The $40 billion spent on SCHIP in the past 10 years financed insurance for roughly 6.6 million youngsters a year. The money was distributed through the states, which were given considerable flexibility in designing their programs. The insurance came from private companies, at rates negotiated by the states.
Governors of both parties -- 43 of them, again including conservatives such as Sonny Perdue of Georgia -- have praised the program. And they endorsed the congressional decision to expand the coverage to an additional 4 million youngsters, at the cost of an additional $35 billion over the next five years. The bill would be financed by a 61-cents-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes. If ever there was a crowd-pleaser of a bill, this is it. Hundreds of organizations -- grass-roots groups ranging from AARP to United Way of America and the national YMCA -- have called on Bush to sign the bill. America's Health Insurance Plans, the largest insurance lobbying group, endorsed the bill on Monday.
But Bush insists that SCHIP is "an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American" -- an eventuality he is determined to prevent.
Bush's adamant stand may be peculiar to him, but the willingness of Republican legislators to line up with him is more significant. Bush does not have to face the voters again, but these men and women will be on the ballot in just over a year -- and their Democratic opponents will undoubtedly remind them of their votes.
Two of their smartest colleagues -- Heather Wilson of New Mexico and Ray LaHood of Illinois -- tried to steer House Republicans away from this political self-immolation, but they had minimal success. The combined influence of White House and congressional leadership -- and what I would have to call herd instinct -- prevailed.
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) argued that "rather than taking the opportunity to cover the children that cannot obtain coverage through Medicaid or the private marketplace, this bill uses these children as pawns in their cynical attempt to make millions of Americans completely reliant upon the government for their health-care needs."
In his new book, former Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan wrote that his fellow Republicans deserved to lose their congressional majority in 2006 because they let spending run out of control and turned a blind eye toward misbehavior by their own members. Now, those Republicans have given voters a fresh reason to question their priorities -- or their common sense.
Saying no to immigration reform and measures to shorten the war in Iraq may be politically defensible, because there are substantial constituencies who question the wisdom of those bills -- and who favor alternative policies. But the Bush administration's arguments against SCHIP -- the cost of the program and the financing -- sound hollow at a time when billions more are being spent in Iraq with no end in sight. Bush's alternative -- a change in the tax treatment of employer-financed health insurance -- has some real appeal, but it is an idea he let languish for months after offering it last winter. And, in the judgment of his fellow Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, Bush's plan is too complex and controversial to be tied to the renewal of SCHIP.
This promised veto is a real poison pill for the GOP.
The spectacle Tuesday of 151 House Republicans voting in lock step with the White House against expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was one of the more remarkable sights of the year. Rarely do you see so many politicians putting their careers in jeopardy.
The bill they opposed, at the urging of President Bush, commands healthy majorities in both the House and Senate but is headed for a veto because Bush objects to expanding this form of safety net for the children of the working poor. He has staked out that ground on his own, ignoring or rejecting the pleas of conservative senators such as Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch, who helped shape the compromise that the House approved and that the Senate endorsed.
SCHIP has been one of the most successful health-care measures created in the past decade. It was started in 1997 with support from both parties, in order to insure children in families with incomes too high to receive Medicaid but who could not afford private insurance.
The $40 billion spent on SCHIP in the past 10 years financed insurance for roughly 6.6 million youngsters a year. The money was distributed through the states, which were given considerable flexibility in designing their programs. The insurance came from private companies, at rates negotiated by the states.
Governors of both parties -- 43 of them, again including conservatives such as Sonny Perdue of Georgia -- have praised the program. And they endorsed the congressional decision to expand the coverage to an additional 4 million youngsters, at the cost of an additional $35 billion over the next five years. The bill would be financed by a 61-cents-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes. If ever there was a crowd-pleaser of a bill, this is it. Hundreds of organizations -- grass-roots groups ranging from AARP to United Way of America and the national YMCA -- have called on Bush to sign the bill. America's Health Insurance Plans, the largest insurance lobbying group, endorsed the bill on Monday.
But Bush insists that SCHIP is "an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American" -- an eventuality he is determined to prevent.
Bush's adamant stand may be peculiar to him, but the willingness of Republican legislators to line up with him is more significant. Bush does not have to face the voters again, but these men and women will be on the ballot in just over a year -- and their Democratic opponents will undoubtedly remind them of their votes.
Two of their smartest colleagues -- Heather Wilson of New Mexico and Ray LaHood of Illinois -- tried to steer House Republicans away from this political self-immolation, but they had minimal success. The combined influence of White House and congressional leadership -- and what I would have to call herd instinct -- prevailed.
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) argued that "rather than taking the opportunity to cover the children that cannot obtain coverage through Medicaid or the private marketplace, this bill uses these children as pawns in their cynical attempt to make millions of Americans completely reliant upon the government for their health-care needs."
In his new book, former Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan wrote that his fellow Republicans deserved to lose their congressional majority in 2006 because they let spending run out of control and turned a blind eye toward misbehavior by their own members. Now, those Republicans have given voters a fresh reason to question their priorities -- or their common sense.
Saying no to immigration reform and measures to shorten the war in Iraq may be politically defensible, because there are substantial constituencies who question the wisdom of those bills -- and who favor alternative policies. But the Bush administration's arguments against SCHIP -- the cost of the program and the financing -- sound hollow at a time when billions more are being spent in Iraq with no end in sight. Bush's alternative -- a change in the tax treatment of employer-financed health insurance -- has some real appeal, but it is an idea he let languish for months after offering it last winter. And, in the judgment of his fellow Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, Bush's plan is too complex and controversial to be tied to the renewal of SCHIP.
This promised veto is a real poison pill for the GOP.
2011 WoW 4.2 PTR: New Hairstyles
invincibleasian
02-17 06:02 PM
Another useful thread!
more...
cleopatra
05-23 09:22 AM
Do you know how long it takes for the SWA order to be posted after a job order has been requested with the SWA?
Is it immediate or does it take some time for the SWA to process the job order and then post it?
Also do you know where we can see the job order after it has been posted? Is there a public site where we can see the jobs?
Any response is greatly appreciated, especially if you know about mass.
Is it immediate or does it take some time for the SWA to process the job order and then post it?
Also do you know where we can see the job order after it has been posted? Is there a public site where we can see the jobs?
Any response is greatly appreciated, especially if you know about mass.
Macaca
02-17 04:53 PM
Judiciary Committee (http://judiciary.senate.gov/)
Sub-committee on Immigration, Border Security and Citizenship (http://judiciary.senate.gov/subcommittees/110/immigration110.cfm)
Jurisdiction
Immigration, citizenship, and refugee laws
Oversight of the Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the immigration functions of the U.S Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Directorate of Border and Transportation Security
Oversight of the immigration-related functions of the Department of Justice, the Department of State, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement, and the Department of Labor
Oversight of international migration and refugee laws and policy
Private immigration relief bills.
Democratic Members
Edward M. Kennedy (http://kennedy.senate.gov/), MA (Chair)
Joseph R. Biden, Jr (http://biden.senate.gov/)., DE
Dianne Feinstein (http://feinstein.senate.gov/), CA
Charles E. Schumer (http://schumer.senate.gov/), NY
Richard J. Durbin (http://durbin.senate.gov/), IL
Republican Members
John Cornyn (http://cornyn.senate.gov/), TX (Ranking Member)
Charles E. Grassley (http://grassley.senate.gov/), IA
Jon Kyl (http://kyl.senate.gov/), AZ
Jeff Sessions (http://sessions.senate.gov/), AL
Senior Staff
Bill Yeomans, Democratic Chief Counsel
Reed O'Connor, Republican Chief Counsel
Press Contact Information (http://judiciary.senate.gov/press.cfm)
Judiciary Committee Hearings (http://judiciary.senate.gov/schedule.cfm)
Comprehensive Immigration Reform (http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=2555), February 28, 2007, 10:00 AM
Strengthening American Competitiveness for the 21st Century (http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2007_03_07/2007_03_07.html), March 7, 9:30 a.m
Written Testimony of William H. Gates (http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2007_03_07/Gates.pdf)
Sub-committee on Immigration, Border Security and Citizenship (http://judiciary.senate.gov/subcommittees/110/immigration110.cfm)
Jurisdiction
Immigration, citizenship, and refugee laws
Oversight of the Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the immigration functions of the U.S Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Directorate of Border and Transportation Security
Oversight of the immigration-related functions of the Department of Justice, the Department of State, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement, and the Department of Labor
Oversight of international migration and refugee laws and policy
Private immigration relief bills.
Democratic Members
Edward M. Kennedy (http://kennedy.senate.gov/), MA (Chair)
Joseph R. Biden, Jr (http://biden.senate.gov/)., DE
Dianne Feinstein (http://feinstein.senate.gov/), CA
Charles E. Schumer (http://schumer.senate.gov/), NY
Richard J. Durbin (http://durbin.senate.gov/), IL
Republican Members
John Cornyn (http://cornyn.senate.gov/), TX (Ranking Member)
Charles E. Grassley (http://grassley.senate.gov/), IA
Jon Kyl (http://kyl.senate.gov/), AZ
Jeff Sessions (http://sessions.senate.gov/), AL
Senior Staff
Bill Yeomans, Democratic Chief Counsel
Reed O'Connor, Republican Chief Counsel
Press Contact Information (http://judiciary.senate.gov/press.cfm)
Judiciary Committee Hearings (http://judiciary.senate.gov/schedule.cfm)
Comprehensive Immigration Reform (http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=2555), February 28, 2007, 10:00 AM
Strengthening American Competitiveness for the 21st Century (http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2007_03_07/2007_03_07.html), March 7, 9:30 a.m
Written Testimony of William H. Gates (http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2007_03_07/Gates.pdf)
more...
cr125rider
05-14 01:28 AM
Thats pretty scary! Cool effect though!
2010 searchquot;wow hairstyles newquot;
RNGC
02-10 09:57 AM
How can we help ourselves to get 2 year AP ? IV admins, can you kindly share with us any info regarding this ?
I know at this moment everyone is looking at the stimulus plan and economy, but , in the mean time we can prepare ourselves with some plan of action...
May be we should push for 3 year EAD/AP . Our argument should be, if we are 3 or more years away ( like EB3 India is currently 2001 or something ), we should get 3 year EAD/AP
Not meant to talk only for EB3 community, but in general as well.
Any thoughts IVians ?
I know at this moment everyone is looking at the stimulus plan and economy, but , in the mean time we can prepare ourselves with some plan of action...
May be we should push for 3 year EAD/AP . Our argument should be, if we are 3 or more years away ( like EB3 India is currently 2001 or something ), we should get 3 year EAD/AP
Not meant to talk only for EB3 community, but in general as well.
Any thoughts IVians ?
more...
kirupa
07-14 04:13 AM
Added! :)
hair You try various hairstyles and hair-stylist in order to get perfect look.
hemya
02-28 11:14 AM
Is your I140 approved?
more...
smsthss
07-18 12:21 PM
Hi,
There is an article in AILA about VISA BULLETIN REVERSAL: NOW WHAT?. Does anybody have any access to that..
There is an article in AILA about VISA BULLETIN REVERSAL: NOW WHAT?. Does anybody have any access to that..
hot Prom hairstyles looks more
Roger Binny
02-20 05:39 PM
Cool, if you dont mind please change the thread title.
more...
house makeup new hairstyles on wow
kirupa
08-11 01:05 AM
Hi metguh!
You cannot adjust the brightness of an object in Blend. What you can do, though, is alter the opacity or transparency.
For best practice from going from PS to Blend, what I would do is rasterize the image and import that image into your Blend project. Silverlight supports images that are PNG and JPEG.
Cheers!
Kirupa :)
You cannot adjust the brightness of an object in Blend. What you can do, though, is alter the opacity or transparency.
For best practice from going from PS to Blend, what I would do is rasterize the image and import that image into your Blend project. Silverlight supports images that are PNG and JPEG.
Cheers!
Kirupa :)
tattoo bow wow hairstyles. Bow Wow and Lil Wayne were; Bow Wow and Lil Wayne were
godbless
08-01 12:06 PM
I called USCIS and checked about it. The officer said that she shoul dnot have applied online and made the payment. She should have sent paper application only. And that there was no need to pay any fee. He said that the amount once paid to USCIS can not be refunded back. Ridiculous.
more...
pictures new hairstyles in wow. medium
hanu_78
12-08 09:29 AM
Yes, as long as you have valid AP, you can re-enter and resume working on a valid EAD.
Thanks for your reply.
Thanks for your reply.
dresses Trendy Long Hairstyle With
FinalGC
03-06 10:25 AM
Guys:
Need your input in a scenario of a friend of mine. My friend's wife is on H1 for the past 4 months and wants to transfer to an H4 visa under her husband. The wife's employer has not paid her any salary nor has he got her any project for the past 4-5 months, hence they are forced to make this decision. The h1 my friend's wife is only H1 approval papers and it is not stamped on her passport. The wife's employer is not willing to give her any papers of release or letter of leave without pay from her employment.
She needs to desperatly change her status to H4.....Suggestions needed??
Question=> Can my friend's wife go to India and apply for a H4 visa directly from the US Consulate in India? Without any papers related to the H1 visa??
Need your input in a scenario of a friend of mine. My friend's wife is on H1 for the past 4 months and wants to transfer to an H4 visa under her husband. The wife's employer has not paid her any salary nor has he got her any project for the past 4-5 months, hence they are forced to make this decision. The h1 my friend's wife is only H1 approval papers and it is not stamped on her passport. The wife's employer is not willing to give her any papers of release or letter of leave without pay from her employment.
She needs to desperatly change her status to H4.....Suggestions needed??
Question=> Can my friend's wife go to India and apply for a H4 visa directly from the US Consulate in India? Without any papers related to the H1 visa??
more...
makeup It is trendy, new , sexy and can satisfy your quench for a perfect hairstyle
tor78
04-25 11:33 AM
You can show/do non-payed or volunteer work on your OPT to avoid the 90 day unemployed restriction.
girlfriend guide. folk wow hairstyle
sufiyan_ansari
03-24 11:22 AM
Hi,
Id like to drag and drop images of the size 100x100 onto the InkCanvas... is it possible?? Plz tell me it is..
Cheers!!:stare:
Id like to drag and drop images of the size 100x100 onto the InkCanvas... is it possible?? Plz tell me it is..
Cheers!!:stare:
hairstyles retro hairstyles for short
supers789
01-24 11:11 AM
My previous employer filed EB2 labor for me. I left the job after getting 140 approved so that I will hold the priority date.
The new employer, as per their policy is planning to file labor application in EB3 category and NOT in EB2 category.
My question is, the way I post PD from old approved 140, do I port the EB2 category also? ie will my PD get compared with EB2 PD or EB3 PD when it comes to filing 485?
Thanks.
The new employer, as per their policy is planning to file labor application in EB3 category and NOT in EB2 category.
My question is, the way I post PD from old approved 140, do I port the EB2 category also? ie will my PD get compared with EB2 PD or EB3 PD when it comes to filing 485?
Thanks.
stefanv
08-03 07:13 AM
Thankx mate :D
sufiyan_ansari
03-28 08:38 AM
At runtime or in Expression Blend?
Thank God Kirupa u replied... pheww...
Yep at Runtime and in Expression Blend..
Desc: I have a listbox populated with 100x100 images... i want to drag it from here and drop in onto an InkCanvas where i have drawn something.
Eg: I have drawn a house and i want to drop an image that describes the colour that must be filled. Hence the images wd be bold colour boxes that would indicate a colour.
Plz help :puzzle:
Thank God Kirupa u replied... pheww...
Yep at Runtime and in Expression Blend..
Desc: I have a listbox populated with 100x100 images... i want to drag it from here and drop in onto an InkCanvas where i have drawn something.
Eg: I have drawn a house and i want to drop an image that describes the colour that must be filled. Hence the images wd be bold colour boxes that would indicate a colour.
Plz help :puzzle:
No comments:
Post a Comment